The Dragonspeak Dialogue Part I

"nd I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon" (Revelation 13:11).

Although most moderns have heard of the concept referred to as the Dialectic, the overwhelming majority carelessly dismiss it as just an ancient word which they simplistically associate withdialogue. Others with a more classical education, tend to view it as a particular brand of philosophy; however, the Dialectic – that which we refer to as Dragonspeak – is actually the deadliest of threats to the entire world.

Indeed, this writer can say with all sincerity that the process of the Dialectic (sometimes called The Dialogue To Consensus), has already defeated the so called Christian "church," and the only group to escape its insidious power is the genuine Remnant of Israel. Further, I would emphatically urge all to take a very serious look at this subject before simply dismissing it as just another fringe theory:

"He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him" (Proverbs 18:13).

As evidence of the power of the spirit behind Dragonspeak, I would submit the following. Just three sentences back, I said the Dialectic has already conquered the Christian church. Now honestly ask yourself the following question: As you read those words, did you, or did you not take umbrage at such an audacious statement and, perhaps even mentally recalled Jesus Christ's words where he said the following:

"…upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it" (Matthew 16:18).

If you did, you have just been processed. A response mechanism was triggered, with an intellectual retort, in which you sought to justify your position – and it can be proven that this precise pattern has been repeatedly articulated by Satanically indwelled individuals, as the ultimate system with which to subtly destroyfaith in Jesus Christ.

Now before you hit reply, and send me an email curtly reiterating Job's wife's horrible advice, please allow me to further examine what just occurred.

There are three stages (or phases) of this "Dialogue To Consensus." The first is the Fact, or the thesis. That is found in the rather barbed statement stipulating that the Dragonspeak Dialogue has already conquered the Christian church. It is not a theory, nor was it couched in phrasing such as "in my opinion, I believe the Dialectic has already conquered the Christian church." It was stated as a fact, as I know it to be true.

Of course, most "believers" have been conditioned to believe otherwise and, when an uncomfortable Fact is asserted, the response is one of Feelings. This is the emotional reaction to facts which disrupt, disturb, or even threaten to destroyrelationships, and relationships are closely associated with feelings. We love our churches, we love our pastors and priests, and we have endearing relationships with people and beliefs which are not built on the Fact of Jesus Christ. Indeed, many of these relationships, both emotional and intellectual, are with people, places, and things which we believe to be thoroughly Christian – yet the Facts say otherwise

Finally, as those Feelings collide with the Facts, the third and final stage of Philosophy, a rational and reasoning form of thinking and decision making, emerges. Thus, Facts collide withFeelings, and when we process the conflict, the result is to justify our Philosophical worldview. This is the heart of the Dialectic process.

Some will immediately recognize the formula under the more familiar version named after Georg Immanuel Hegel, usually dubbed the Hegelian Dialectic, which has been reduced to Thesis versus Antithesis equals SynthesisHere we have rephrased it to Facts versus Feelings equals Philosophy

Far from some high brow theoretical formula which only exists in some intellectual ivory tower, this "Dialogue To Consensus" actually began in the Garden of Eden, and when the 20th century finally arrived, a key group of intellectuals codified its structure, and ultimately introduced it to America's post World War II educational system.

As the underlying Philosophy of the Dialectical paradigm burrowed its way into the baby-boom generation, and those young people became the parents and grandparents of successive generations, the Dragonspeak Dialogue penetrated deeper and deeper into American, and world culture.

Unfortunately, because the majority of people have actually had their thought processes changed through this nefarious process, the Dialectic system not only perpetuates itself, it serves as a defense mechanism to insulate its intellectual prisoners from a Scripturally sound, Didactic (meaning fixed) analysis which would return us to the ways of the LORD. It is now far too late to uproot it from our social structure.

Even though this "Dragonspeak Dialogue" is most easily recognized in political applications, it is, in fact, a Spiritual virus. Dialectic expert Dean Gotcher characterizes it asintellectual witchcraft, and the terrible truth is, this formula is the key to the method which was used to leaven what most Christians believe to be the body of Christ – a body which was prophesied to be transformed into what the Scriptures identify as Babylon.

In this regard, I return to the earlier example, wherein the Scriptures themselves can be applied to seek to diminish the impact of a Fact – an elusive phenomena which is also known as the truth. I said the church has been defeated by the Dialectic process – a statement which offends sensibilities on a wholesale basis. The result is to cite a Scripture, out of context, where the LORD says the gates of Hell will not prevail against His church.

This is precisely what Satan did, when he quoted Scripture, out of context, when the truth was standing in front of him. As the devil sought to draw Jesus into a dialogue, the LORD stood firm with Facts. He said

"It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God" (Matthew 4:4).

This is a Fact, for it is written. Next, Satan's attempt at anemotional response arrives, as he seeks to introduce doubt, which is Feelings oriented. He does this through posing a question, which was couched in language that not only seeks to ignite a dialogue with Christ, it subtly seeks to implant doubt in the mind of Jesus – clearly an emotional mechanism being used to deflect the Fact that Jesus is the Son of God. Further, in the fashion in which the devil couches his words, he subtly implies he is considering Christ's claim of deity by using the word "if" – as though he might just rethink his position if Jesus answers him adequately:

"If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down…." (Matthew 4:6).

Finally, the Philosophy is the result, as Satan then cites Scriptureout of context, as a defense – which is the synthesis of the collision between the two:

"….it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone" (Matthew 4:6).

Thus, we see that Scripture, applied in order to sustain the relationship which is threatened by the truth, is heresy, and the "church" is committing this practice NOW, on a daily basis.

-- James Lloyd

To Be Continued

A further look at the insidious process addressed in the present work is found in the book from the present author entitled DRAGONSPEAK: THE LANGUAGE OF LUCIFER.

Article Source: 
Article Number: