The Culting Of Christianity

Miscommunication & Perception

   
I recently had an interaction with a Christian that reminded me how
important it is to recognize a phenomena that virtually all
counter-cult experts have documented. This is the simple fact that
words and doctrines that seem to be universally understood in a
Christian context can carry a completely different meaning to
people that have been ensnared in a cultic mindset.

   
For example, a salesman at a Christian book publisher called me
recently in an attempt to get us to order more books from his
employer. This publisher, known as Hearthstone Publishing, is
associated with the Rapture Cult group known as The Southwest Radio
Church
out of Oklahoma.

   
I had somewhat reluctantly ordered a respectable wholesale quantity of
a single title from this group earlier this year because they put out
a book critically examining the Preterist apostasy. I'll
remind readers that Preterism is the doctrine that says the
Tribulation already happened in 70 AD and Christ
returned invisibly at that time. Although I knew the book would
be from a Rapture Cult perspective, at least some of the arguments against
Preterism would be valid.

   
My own book assaulting the false doctrine of Preterism
(entitled Days Of Future Past: The Preterist Apostasy) could
not possibly have covered every argument, and because Christian
Media
is committed to opposing Preterism, I wanted to add
to our knowledge base on the subject. Unfortunately, very few have
recognized the enormous threat of Preterism and, as such, there are
very few titles available exposing the subject. This might surprise
the reader, but I would venture to say that for every published book criticizing
Preterism, there are 50 promoting it. Thus, like a fireman
throwing everything he has against a rapidly spreading blaze, I am
even willing to distribute a book written from the erroneous pre-tribulationist
Rapture perspective in order to attack this deadly false doctrine.

How
Dare You Call Me A Cultist!

   
Now, the paragraph before last, I used the phrase "Rapture Cult."
Because there are undoubtedly many pre-tribulation rapture
adherents that are reading these words, it's very likely there are
some that have never heard their own belief system referred to as a
"cult." Furthermore, this term is virtually guaranteed to inflame
the sensibilities
of those "rapturists" that have never
considered any form of what appears to be mainstream
Christianity to be cultic in nature.

   
The fact is, the Rapture Cult is just that: a previously tiny
cultic group that spread their perspective so effectively that they
have emerged as the dominant party in what is presently called
evangelical Christianity. In the process, they quietly shed various
early doctrinal arguments of extremely dubious value, revised the
record concerning their original historical roots, and criminally
covered up the actual source of the cultic system.

   
But back to the episode with the rapture book salesman.
After patiently listening to his pitch, I politely and diplomatically
told him the only reason we purchased the single book from his group
was because we are aggressive opponents of the Preterist
doctrine; however, we won't be ordering any other titles from his
group because we are also firmly against the pre-tribulation rapture
doctrine espoused by his employer. I did not use the inflammatory
phrase Rapture Cult,
nor did I seek in any way seek to provoke
the man. I simply and calmly stated that Christian Media is
post-tribulationist and that the Bible plainly teaches
us that Christ will return and resurrect the believer "immediately
after the tribulation..." (Matthew 24:29).

   
Sensing I only had a few seconds to make any scriptural point before
the salesman reverted to his programming, I quickly mentioned
how Jesus said he would resurrect the believer
"on the last day" in John chapter 6. Indeed, Christ repeated the
statement FOUR times in that chapter saying those that believe
in Him will be raised from the dead on "the last day." (John 6:39,
40, 44, 54). I then asked the young man 'If the dead in Christ are
raised at the last day, how then can that "last day" happen
7 years before the 2nd coming of Christ, and still be the last
day?' (I Corinthians 15:51, I Thessalonians 4:16).

   
That was the "last" full sentence I was able to state, as the
young salesman quickly became enraged and would not allow me to
complete a single sentence after that. He immediately launched into
what could only be called a very aggressive diatribe of how the
land of Israel belongs to the Jews! He grew angrier and angrier,
and denounced those that want to take "dominion." He never cited a
single verse in scripture, and after a few minutes more of a one sided
conversation, he yelled at me and abruptly hung up the phone on me!
Noting that he had called me to sell our ministry some books,
and having some background in sales, I shook my head and said aloud
"this was not a very good sales call!"

   
After the intense exchange, I thought a bit about it and, once again,
tried to evaluate what had just happened. I had never even mentioned Israel,
nor the Jews, or even voiced an opinion as to land rights in
the Middle East. The only thing I mentioned was the order of the
resurrection

- and yet the man's statements were
completely focused on the issue of Jewish versus Palestinian claims to
the historic land of Israel!

   
What this interaction illustrates is how easily it is to become so
programmed into a particular perspective that when we encounter
opposition, we fall into a pre-arranged pattern of response. The
phenomena is not dissimilar to an old married couple that fights the
same fight over and over. They might have a spat over something
relatively recent and inconsequential, but they frequently end up
falling into the behavioral abyss of rehashing something they've
already clashed on repeatedly many years before.

   
In this case, experiential and doctrinal conditioning has programmed
the young book salesman to believe that anyone that opposes the
pre-tribulation rapture must be a dominionist and is therefore
against the Jewish people laying claim to their historic territory.
This is nonsense, but because he can't think 'outside of the box'
as the popular idiom states, he immediately leaped to the fallacious
conclusion of his position

- that the real issue of the
so-called "rapture" is the pre-eminent position of the Jews in the
Middle East.

   
This is religious programming of the very worst kind,
because it assumes an end position before any intelligent
inquiry begins. Indeed, with rapturists, in most cases the
subject is not even open for a scripturally centered discussion. The
fact is, while we are not dispensational (the technical
term for the pre-tribulationists), we are not against
Jewish control of that hotly contested tiny tract of land that has
become "a burdensome stone for all people...." (Zechariah 12:3).

   
In this person's perspective, the issue of Jewish pre-eminence is so
crucial to his worldview that he simply defers any scriptural
examination of the weak foundation that his conclusion is resting
upon. Very few Christians realize that the reason the rapturists fight
so fiercely for pre-trib is not only because they have grave
difficulty envisioning actually being in the
tribulation, they know that the doctrine is the lynchpin to their
larger understanding of prophetic fulfillment vis a vis our so-called
"Judaeo-Christian" heritage.

   
Thus, vast numbers of Christians blindly accept the ultimate
conclusions of a theological system without a thorough examination of
the full implications of the position they hold. I submit this
is a classic characteristic of a cult
.

   
Indeed, one of the reasons the rapture folks argue so strenuously
concerning the so-called "ancient origin" of the pre-tribulation
rapture doctrine is the fact that the historical record clearly places
the doctrine as emerging during the period when almost every other American
cult system
was developed. For instance, the Mormon
religion, the cultic group known as Jehovah's Witnesses, Mary
Baker Eddy's Gnostic originated Christian Science, and
virtually all the other modern rivals to Biblical Christianity were
formed around the same period.


   
Even groups such as the 7th Day Adventists and subsequent
splinter groups such as Herbert W Armstrong's Worldwide Church Of
God and even the pre-Pentecostal group known as Branhamites
were spiritually birthed during the explosive cult creating 19th
century. Although at least one Catholic intellectual anticipated the
doctrine, an unbiased appraisal of the Rapture Cult conclusively
demonstrates the origin of the system is rooted in an 1830
Scottish cult that was involved in various spiritualist practices -
including levitation. By denying the truth of these facts in
order to sustain the desired political result of the system, the
proponents of the doctrine have built their house on the shifting sand
of false doctrine, and given the great deceiver an enormous stronghold
from which to continue his nefarious work.

   
While this study will continue with another installment in a future
edition of Christian Media Currents, I will close
with the following plea: Instead of confirming our statements by
refusing to hear any more on the subject and demanding to be deleted
from the email list receiving this periodical, why not prove me wrong
on one simple front? Just as I asked the book salesman, I ask the
reader the same fundamental question based on SCRIPTURE.

   
The Bible plainly teaches us that "the dead in Christ will rise" before
the living believers when He comes for His church (I
Corinthians 15:51). Because Jesus Christ promises the
believer that it is on "the last day" that He will "raise him up"
(again he makes this statement 4 times in a single chapter),
how can that 'raising up' be on the last day if the "dead
in Christ" rise at the so-called rapture years before the 2nd
coming?

July 15, 2002 -- James Lloyd

Copyright © 2002 Christian Media Network

See Also

The Rapture Cult: Dishonesty In Dispensationalism

Lying In Laodicea: Rapturism Unmasked

The Remnant Of Israel

The Remnant In Romans

Article Source: 
CMC
Article Number: 
32